bakersfield, p.d.
critically acclaimed.
quirky.
prematurely cancelled.
you’d think i’d love it. my kind of show. northern exposure? loved it! andy richter controls the universe? more please! freaks and geeks? twin peaks? own the dvds!
so, bakersfield, p.d., “brilliant but cancelled,” according to my friends at trio. i like trio. it’s one of the reasons i was giddy when i finally got digital cable (the others being turner classic movies and re-runs of the adventures of pete and pete on the n). i giggle with them at the folly of cop rock and the stupidity of pink lady and jeff, they show rowan and martins laugh-in for christ sake! and egg, the art show. i love egg, the art show! they know what i like and they like, nay love, bakersfield, p.d., so i watched, i wanted to give it the chance i never gave it when it aired.
when i lived in bakersfield, when it first aired, i just couldn’t bring myself to watch it. it’s hard to see the place you live, the place you know, treated as thought it’s the most podunk of podunk towns. a town full of ignorant, but sweet, people who’ve, seemingly, never set eyes on an outsider before. so dry and so brown, a town long past its prime. the bakersfield in bakersfield, p.d. out small-towns mayberry, out quirkys cicily, and out hicks hee-haw. the bakersfield in bakersfield, p.d. is not bakersfield, california. it’s a town built on johnny carson jokes and drives from l.a. to san francisco.
the main difference between bakersfield, p.d.’s bakersfield and mayberry, cicily, and, even, twin peeks is that those quirky, little, small towns are fictional. they don’t exist. there are no residents to offend when you portray them as adorably inept. no questions raised when the landscape of the town portrayed bears no resemblance to that of the actual setting of the show. basically, no feelings hurt.
a half hour long show about how dumb and small your town is is hard to watch.
now that i live in new york, though, now that i’m a new yorker, i should be able to appreciate this show for the great writing and nuanced acting for which it was lauded. i should be able to laugh at what so many others have called “one of the funniest, well-made comedies to ever hit the tube.”
i tried.
i can’t.
i just sit there, shaking my head, talking to my tv (“that’s not what it’s like.” “that’s not what we’re like.” “where’d you film this? taft!?!”). then i change the channel.
distance hasn’t changed anything.
i guess, maybe, i’m not much of a new yorker after all.