First of all, before I introduce myself, I’d just like to say that over the years, Linda Ronstadt has recorded several songs with Aaron Neville.
And it’s always magic, isn’t it?
Sorry, that was part of another conversation I was having. I thought it was worth repeating.
So here’s the thing. In addition to studying improv at UCB, and having a quote-unquote real job in book publishing (when you say “quote-unquote,” do you actually put in the quotes, too? I’m not sure), I am also quite seriously working on a novel. So my fear in writing this journal is that it will end up sucking away all the time from my “quote-unquote” real writing. However, I’m bored right now, and don’t feel like working on something that involves paying attention to character or story or sentence structure.
And consequently…you’re the winner.
That means all of you, incidentally. Even the guy who’s eating a ham sandwich and masturbating. Yeah, I see you. (Weren’t you in my Level One? Weren't you the guy who started every scene with digging?)
Anyway, it seems to me that despite the fact that I’m just now learning to perform a Harold, and even simply how to competently enact a good, solid scene, I’ve probably got a lot to tell you about improvisational theory. The same, I’m sure, holds true for thermonuclear physics, so I’ll be throwing in a bit about that, as well, in addition to other advanced subjects I’m clearly not an expert on.
Occasionally, too, I will throw in some sex. Boob, for instance. Boob is a word that’s sometimes related to sex.
That got your attention, huh? Heh heh heh.
Now we’re all masturbating.
So just to kick things off, and to keep the conversation geared toward sex so I hold your attention while we’re still getting to know each other, let’s talk about physical comfort zones in scene-work.
Let’s say that you’re in a practice group, or in a class, and one of the guys—or one of the girls—is making one of the guys—or one of the girls—feel uncomfortable in their scenes. Maybe he keeps touching her on the…
…wait for it…
…boobs, or maybe he just keeps initiating sex-related scenes. Maybe it’s not a matter of actual touching, but just language. Or perhaps just a weird vibe the other person gets. And by the way, maybe they’re not a man and a woman. Maybe they’re both men, or both women. (Let’s all of us men reading this right now just concentrate on the phrase “maybe they’re both women” for a second. There. That was good. Ahhh.)
But anyway, how do you handle it? Do you inform the coach, so that he—or she—will be aware of the dynamic and say something subtle and gentle yet clear and forceful in class? Or does the one group member need to communicate their thoughts to the one making him—or her—uncomfortable? What would you do?
If this were happening in my class or practice group, I would get into the scene in a walk-on and start humping the person who’s making the other person feel uncomfortable. This way, that person will know what it feels like. And I’ll get to hump someone.
Boob.
Actually, my real thoughts are that people doing scenes together evoke a subtle, often unspoken contract with each other. They slowly progress with what they can do with and to each other in scenes and stay comfortable. If it’s a question of subtle boundaries that aren’t being respected, it’s the responsibility of the person being made uncomfortable to somehow clearly (yet gently) communicate their feelings to their partner. And if that doesn’t work, they should let their teacher (or coach) know, so that they can be aware of it, and maybe say something in class, giving the uncomfortable person an easy venue for clearly responding and saying how they feel.
It’s also everyone’s responsibility to be vigilantly aware of how what they’re doing or saying might be affecting their scene partners.
Isn’t that what scenes are about, anyway, at heart? Strong, clear—and sometimes subtle, and unspoken—communication?
That’s all I have to say right now. In my next entry, we’ll segue seamlessly into a discussion of either walk-ons, mayonnaise, or hydrogen peroxide, specifically in the service of determining which one tastes best on a ham sandwich, as well as how to put it out if it threatens to detonate. I will definitely relate this to improv in an extended metaphor of some sort.
So circling back to the beginning—much like in a well-performed Harold—I’d just like to say, as Aaron Neville once sang to Linda Ronstadt (did they actually have sex in real life, and is it just me who likes to wonder about that?), I don’t know much…
…but I know I love you.
But for the purposes of this journal, when I say “you,” I mean “improv.” (And certainly not the guy with the ham sandwich—that’s disgusting, dude! And why are you looking at my journal? Why don’t you go to a good porn site, or New York Magazine, or something?)
Until the Second Beat…
And it’s always magic, isn’t it?
Sorry, that was part of another conversation I was having. I thought it was worth repeating.
So here’s the thing. In addition to studying improv at UCB, and having a quote-unquote real job in book publishing (when you say “quote-unquote,” do you actually put in the quotes, too? I’m not sure), I am also quite seriously working on a novel. So my fear in writing this journal is that it will end up sucking away all the time from my “quote-unquote” real writing. However, I’m bored right now, and don’t feel like working on something that involves paying attention to character or story or sentence structure.
And consequently…you’re the winner.
That means all of you, incidentally. Even the guy who’s eating a ham sandwich and masturbating. Yeah, I see you. (Weren’t you in my Level One? Weren't you the guy who started every scene with digging?)
Anyway, it seems to me that despite the fact that I’m just now learning to perform a Harold, and even simply how to competently enact a good, solid scene, I’ve probably got a lot to tell you about improvisational theory. The same, I’m sure, holds true for thermonuclear physics, so I’ll be throwing in a bit about that, as well, in addition to other advanced subjects I’m clearly not an expert on.
Occasionally, too, I will throw in some sex. Boob, for instance. Boob is a word that’s sometimes related to sex.
That got your attention, huh? Heh heh heh.
Now we’re all masturbating.
So just to kick things off, and to keep the conversation geared toward sex so I hold your attention while we’re still getting to know each other, let’s talk about physical comfort zones in scene-work.
Let’s say that you’re in a practice group, or in a class, and one of the guys—or one of the girls—is making one of the guys—or one of the girls—feel uncomfortable in their scenes. Maybe he keeps touching her on the…
…wait for it…
…boobs, or maybe he just keeps initiating sex-related scenes. Maybe it’s not a matter of actual touching, but just language. Or perhaps just a weird vibe the other person gets. And by the way, maybe they’re not a man and a woman. Maybe they’re both men, or both women. (Let’s all of us men reading this right now just concentrate on the phrase “maybe they’re both women” for a second. There. That was good. Ahhh.)
But anyway, how do you handle it? Do you inform the coach, so that he—or she—will be aware of the dynamic and say something subtle and gentle yet clear and forceful in class? Or does the one group member need to communicate their thoughts to the one making him—or her—uncomfortable? What would you do?
If this were happening in my class or practice group, I would get into the scene in a walk-on and start humping the person who’s making the other person feel uncomfortable. This way, that person will know what it feels like. And I’ll get to hump someone.
Boob.
Actually, my real thoughts are that people doing scenes together evoke a subtle, often unspoken contract with each other. They slowly progress with what they can do with and to each other in scenes and stay comfortable. If it’s a question of subtle boundaries that aren’t being respected, it’s the responsibility of the person being made uncomfortable to somehow clearly (yet gently) communicate their feelings to their partner. And if that doesn’t work, they should let their teacher (or coach) know, so that they can be aware of it, and maybe say something in class, giving the uncomfortable person an easy venue for clearly responding and saying how they feel.
It’s also everyone’s responsibility to be vigilantly aware of how what they’re doing or saying might be affecting their scene partners.
Isn’t that what scenes are about, anyway, at heart? Strong, clear—and sometimes subtle, and unspoken—communication?
That’s all I have to say right now. In my next entry, we’ll segue seamlessly into a discussion of either walk-ons, mayonnaise, or hydrogen peroxide, specifically in the service of determining which one tastes best on a ham sandwich, as well as how to put it out if it threatens to detonate. I will definitely relate this to improv in an extended metaphor of some sort.
So circling back to the beginning—much like in a well-performed Harold—I’d just like to say, as Aaron Neville once sang to Linda Ronstadt (did they actually have sex in real life, and is it just me who likes to wonder about that?), I don’t know much…
…but I know I love you.
But for the purposes of this journal, when I say “you,” I mean “improv.” (And certainly not the guy with the ham sandwich—that’s disgusting, dude! And why are you looking at my journal? Why don’t you go to a good porn site, or New York Magazine, or something?)
Until the Second Beat…
Last edited: