I do not like interviews or monologs.
You'll pull up an audience member and ask them a bunch of questions, or you'll have someone tell a story. Then, you'll do something with that information.
This can get tricky.
I think it's bad form to just see what we just heard acted out. If it's a funny story, however, you might find yourself wishing for that, rather than what you're seeing.
Even if it's all done the 'proper' way (a story is told and elements from it are pulled out, essentially turning one suggestion into several suggestions), to me it feels watered-down and overly complicated.
That gets into another dislike, openings, which do the same kind of thing.
Maybe I just don't like a whole rigamarole.
I came from a short-form background where the more complex or long any explanation, format, or procedure was, the greater the chance it'd suck.
I also don't like them from a performer point-of-view. The more steps and pieces, the more I feel like there's a right and wrong and I should be thinking. I want to get a small spark of inspiration and then play until a scene and all its elements are built.
I'm not saying that I haven't seen enjoyable interviews and monologs turned into enjoyable scenes. I'm not saying that people who do them are bad or should be protested or indicted. It's just something that I don't particularly like to see or do.
It's not my cup of tea.
Discuss.
Other dislikes?