Congratulations...
- Thread starter Maddy
- Start date
I just read about this the other day!
m-w.com:
"Some handbooks and textbooks recommend that each other be restricted to reference to two and one another to reference to three or more. The distinction, while neat, is not observed in actual usage. Each other and one another are used interchangeably by good writers and have been since at least the sixteenth century."
So there's essentially no difference.
m-w.com:
"Some handbooks and textbooks recommend that each other be restricted to reference to two and one another to reference to three or more. The distinction, while neat, is not observed in actual usage. Each other and one another are used interchangeably by good writers and have been since at least the sixteenth century."
So there's essentially no difference.
I would say there is no distinction. Here's what the Columbia Journalism Review says:
http://www.cjr.org/tools/lc/each.asp
http://www.cjr.org/tools/lc/each.asp
I think the easiest way to state the rule is that you should only use which when the clause it introduces is an independent clause which is not essential to understanding the rest of the sentence.
Moby Dick is the book that I want to to read.
(That I want to read explains which book you are referring to.)
I want to read Moby Dick, which was written by Herman Melville.
(Which was written by Herman Melville is adding more information to the sentence, but you could take it away and the sentence would still make sense.)
Note that which in this sense is usually preceded by a comma.
Moby Dick is the book that I want to to read.
(That I want to read explains which book you are referring to.)
I want to read Moby Dick, which was written by Herman Melville.
(Which was written by Herman Melville is adding more information to the sentence, but you could take it away and the sentence would still make sense.)
Note that which in this sense is usually preceded by a comma.
I must argue here with what I believe is the incorrect use of "want."
Nobody "wants" to read Moby Dick.
I made the mistake of reading Moby Dick because I thought I should , and while the beginning was lively and interesting, for a long stretch in the middle I "wanted" someone to harpoon me and get me out of it.
A more correct usage of "want" with "Herman Melville" in the same sentence would be, "I want to read 'Bartleby the Scrivener' by Herman Melville, which I hear is a kick-ass short story."
Nobody "wants" to read Moby Dick.
I made the mistake of reading Moby Dick because I thought I should , and while the beginning was lively and interesting, for a long stretch in the middle I "wanted" someone to harpoon me and get me out of it.
A more correct usage of "want" with "Herman Melville" in the same sentence would be, "I want to read 'Bartleby the Scrivener' by Herman Melville, which I hear is a kick-ass short story."
Last edited:
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a
wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be
in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed
it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh, and I
awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a
wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be
in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed
it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh, and I
awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.
Can we please figure out how to use apostrophes?
CDs, DVDs, the '90s, the Roaring '20s, there are weirdos along the way, not weirdo's.
If you're just pluralizing, don't put in a '. If you are eliminating a part of something to shorten it, put in a '. If something belongs to someone, put in the ', except with its.
The toy robot has a lightbulb: It is its lightbulb, or it's its lightbulb.
It's Tommy's robot.
CDs, DVDs, the '90s, the Roaring '20s, there are weirdos along the way, not weirdo's.
If you're just pluralizing, don't put in a '. If you are eliminating a part of something to shorten it, put in a '. If something belongs to someone, put in the ', except with its.
The toy robot has a lightbulb: It is its lightbulb, or it's its lightbulb.
It's Tommy's robot.