The point of my post was only to point out the falseness of saying that long form is only being performed for other performers. Those statements are untrue. If I’m going to get into it though…
It takes a while to get good at long form and you need a place to perform until you are able to do consistently good work that a non improv audience would be entertained by. As a result there’s a scene where people do a lot of performing for their peers. I don’t think any long form improviser here would debate that. The problem I have is that you make it sound like people who are doing long form are sitting around and patting each other on the back rather than working on a craft which can and is intended to entertain a non-improviser audience. I can take 4 or 5 of the funniest people I know right now and have them doing a pretty good short form show consisting of World’s Worst, Party Quirks and Conducted Story by the end of the week. If I taught those same people long form it would take much, much longer. Short form is easier. That’s not up for debate right? If you want to put up a short form show you’ll be doing it sooner. You sound like someone who walks into a culinary school and says, “Why are you guys just cooking for the class? You all know how to make Hot Pockets. People love Hot Pockets! Get out there!”
Also classes AREN’T geared towards teaching you how to get on a Harold team, or impress artistic directors. You’re wrong. That’s you reading into them. I teach at UCB and not once have I ever said, “Good job, I really feel like we’re getting closer to getting you guys on a Harold Team.” I’ve also never heard that said in a single class I’ve taken as a student. At the theatre I teach at, the point of classes is to get you good at Harold which teaches you skills that help you to be successful at comedy. I bet every teacher at the Magnet, PIT, UCB or any other theatre has the same goal.
It takes a while to get good at long form and you need a place to perform until you are able to do consistently good work that a non improv audience would be entertained by. As a result there’s a scene where people do a lot of performing for their peers. I don’t think any long form improviser here would debate that. The problem I have is that you make it sound like people who are doing long form are sitting around and patting each other on the back rather than working on a craft which can and is intended to entertain a non-improviser audience. I can take 4 or 5 of the funniest people I know right now and have them doing a pretty good short form show consisting of World’s Worst, Party Quirks and Conducted Story by the end of the week. If I taught those same people long form it would take much, much longer. Short form is easier. That’s not up for debate right? If you want to put up a short form show you’ll be doing it sooner. You sound like someone who walks into a culinary school and says, “Why are you guys just cooking for the class? You all know how to make Hot Pockets. People love Hot Pockets! Get out there!”
Also classes AREN’T geared towards teaching you how to get on a Harold team, or impress artistic directors. You’re wrong. That’s you reading into them. I teach at UCB and not once have I ever said, “Good job, I really feel like we’re getting closer to getting you guys on a Harold Team.” I’ve also never heard that said in a single class I’ve taken as a student. At the theatre I teach at, the point of classes is to get you good at Harold which teaches you skills that help you to be successful at comedy. I bet every teacher at the Magnet, PIT, UCB or any other theatre has the same goal.